Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³ôÀÌ°¡ ´Ù¸¥ Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó¾ÇÀýÁ¦¼ú ȯÀÚÀÇ ¸¸Á·µµ

Patients¡¯ satisfaction on the obturators with different extension heights into defects after maxillectomy

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 48±Ç 1È£ p.41 ~ 47
±ÇÈ£¹ü, ÀÌÀçºÀ, ÀÓ¼øÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±ÇÈ£¹ü ( Kwon Ho-Beom ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÀçºÀ ( Lee Jai-Bong ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÓ¼øÈ£ ( Im Sun-Ho ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø º¸Ã¶°ú

Abstract

¿¬±¸¸ñÀû : ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº °á¼ÕºÎ ³»·Î ³·°Ô ¿¬ÀåµÈ Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¿Í ³ô°Ô ¿¬ÀåµÈ Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¸¦ ȯÀÚÀÇ ¸¸Á·µµ ¹× ¼±È£µµ¸¦ ÅëÇØ ºñ±³ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: »ó¾ÇÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» ¹Þ°í º¸Ã¶Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº 11¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °á¼ÕºÎ ³»ÀÇ ¿¬ÀåºÎÀÇ ³ôÀÌ°¡ ´Ù¸£°í ³ª¸ÓÁö ÇüÅ°¡ ÅëÀÏÇÑ Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¸¦ °¢ ȯÀÚ ´ç 2°³¾¿ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¸¦ 2´Þ °£ ¹ø°¥¾Æ »ç¿ëÇÏ°Ô ÇÑ ÈÄ È¯ÀÚ¿¡°Ô Æó¼âÀåÄ¡ÀÇ »ç¿ëÆíÀǼº, ¹ßÀ½, ºñÀ½¼º, ´©Ãâ, ÀúÀÛ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æó¼âÀåÄ¡µéÀÇ ¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ ¼³¹®À» ÅëÇØ Á¶»çÇÏ°í, ÃÖÁ¾ÀûÀ¸·Î ȯÀÚµéÀÇ ¼±È£µµ¿Í ±× ÀÌÀ¯¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷À̸¦ Wilcoxon signed rank test¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù (P< .05).

°á°ú : ±¸°³ °á¼ÕºÎ ³»·ÎÀÇ ¿¬ÀåºÎÀÇ ³ôÀÌ°¡ ³·Àº Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¿Í ³ôÀº Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¿¡ ´ëÇØ È¯ÀÚµéÀÇ Æò°¡´Â Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù (P > .05). ±×¸®°í ³ôÀº Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¿Í ³·Àº Æó¼âÀåÄ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ È¯ÀÚµéÀÇ ¼±È£µµ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á·Ð :»ó¾ÇÀýÁ¦¼ú ÈÄ °³±¸°¡ Á¦ÇѵǴ »óȲÀ̳ª º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ »ðÀԷΰ¡ Á¦ÇѵǴ µî Ư¼öÇÑ »óȲ¿¡¼­´Â ¿¬ÀåºÎ°¡ ³·Àº ³ôÀÌÀÇ Æó¼âÀåÄ¡°¡ ÃßõµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the functional abilities of the low bulb obturators with those of high bulb obturators in terms of patients¡¯ evaluation.

Materials and Methods : This study included 11 maxillectomy patients who underwent postoperative prosthodontic rehabilitations. Two obturators of the same design except for different bulb heights, were fabricated for each of the maxillectomy patient. After two months of alternate use, the functions of the obturators were measured by investigating the patients¡¯ subjective evaluations in terms of convenience, speech, nasality, leakage, and mastication and identifying their preferred prostheses. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used as a statistical method (P < .05).

Results: There were no significant differences in patient evaluations of low and high bulb obturators (P >.05). And patients¡¯ preferences varied.

Conclusion: In extreme situation such as in mouth opening limitation, the use of low bulb obturators can be recommended and result in comparable speech function to that of obturators with high lateral walls.

Å°¿öµå

»ó¾ÇÀýÁ¦¼ú;±¸°³ °á¼Õ;Æó¼âÀåÄ¡;¸¸Á·µµ;¼±È£µµ;Æó¼âÀåÄ¡ ³ôÀÌ
Maxillectomy;Obturator;Preference;Obturator height

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed